Deviance Essay -- essays research papers fc

"Discuss how one of the sociological theories of deviance shadow be used to apologise well-disposed phenomena, much(prenominal) as pornography, drug use, suicide and disability."By Vanessa Neil1 - founding2 - A draft background to the Interactionist Perspective3 - more(prenominal) recent emergences in the Interactionist Perspective4 - Using the Interactionist Perspective to explain social phenomena5 - ConclusionIntroductionDeviant demeanour has sadly been a ongoing occurrence in society throughout history, more noticeably in life today. Sociologists have been provoked to study and piddle theories in order to try and explain why social phenomena such(prenominal) as suicide, prostitution and drug use occur in our society. The Interactionist Perspective, cognise to many as the Labelling Theory, is interested in social processes and examines deviant behaviour using such methods as social typing. The Interactionists emphasise the role that meanings course in the cre ation of deviant behaviour and gain a greater understanding of what it means to commit actions that others label as deviant. A Brief background to the Interactionist PerspectiveIn order to discuss how the Interactionist theory can be used to explain deviance, it is necessary to understand the historical development and procession of this theory. The Interactionists firstly believe that there ar no behaviours that are intrinsically deviant. Secondly, Deviant actions are simply those which are defined as deviant within a certain culture or setting. thus Interactionists focus on social processes by which certain behaviours become cognize as deviant and the consequences for those who are labelled deviant. (Aggleton, 1987, chpt 4)The Interactionist approach was at its vertex during the 1960s and 1970s, shedding a whole new, fresh perspective on the study of deviance. Here in Australia research on deviance was basically Functionalist and Positivist, Until 1970 when more critical app roaches, like the Interactionist perspective began to appear. (Sargent, Nillan & international ampere Winter, 1997, pg 387) Interestingly the origins of the Interactionist approach go back as far as 18th cytosine Philosophers, arguing with Positivists about how to best explain social behaviour. In 1938, professor, Frank Tannenbaum first observed the actual reactions to certain behaviours, or else than on beha... ...n going in our society due to the stickiness of labels and the self-fulfilling prophesy in which people grow into further careers of deviance, and the deviant cycle continues.BibliographyAggleton, P. (1987). Deviance. London Tavistock PublicationsAnleu, S.L Roach. (1991). Deviance, obligingness and Control. Melbourne Longman Cheshire Goode, E. (1990). Deviant Behaviour. bare-assed Jersey Prentice HallPontell, H.N. (1999). Social Deviance. New Jersey Prentice HallRubington, E & Weinberg M.S. (1999). Deviance, The Interactionist Perspective. Boston Allyn & BaconS argent, M & Nilan, P & Winter, G. (1997). The new Sociology for Australians. Melbourne LongmanTraub, S.H & precise C.B. (1994). Theories of Deviance. Illinois F.E Peacock PublishersAdditional ReadingCohen, S. (1977). Images of Deviance. England Penguin BooksMcGrath, J.H & Scarpitti F.R. (1970). Youth and Drugs, Perspectives on a Social Problem. Illinois Scott, Foresman and CompanyWilson, P.R & Braithwaite, J. (1978). Two faces of Deviance. Queensland University of Queensland Press