Is It Better to Be a Member of a Group Than to Be the Leader?

ESSAY Do you agree with the pursual statement? It is better to be a outgrowth of a mathematical group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific actors and examples to support your answer. I personally disagree with the statement that it is better to be a genus Phallus of a group than a leader. It is true that being a ingredient is certainly much more comfortable, as you have less duty, and you argon not the one who makes the final decisions.Also, some people may be too shy, too reserved or not charismatic bounteous to become a leader. However, in my opinion, a leader is a member too, but a leader does more. First of all, a leader takes responsibility for making decisions and guiding the others in a certain direction. The second reason is that if you take the responsibility of being the leader, you are more active. Thus, your participation in the group is much more interesting and exciting.You are more come to about what is happening around you, and you do not just coun t for other people to do everything. In other words, you are not passive, and you get involved. Finally, if you are a good leader, then the others will regard as you, and gaining peoples respect is important if you want to have a good place in society. As a conclusion, I would secern that, to me, it is more interesting to be a leader than to be further a member, as it can be so much more stimulating and enriching for your personal and professional life.